
Jury Team Proposal: Limiting the number of British troops sent to Afghanistan to the average number sent by other NATO countries (relative to their population).
Recent Media Mentions
The Independent - Podium Column
Paul Judge: UK
sacrifices in Afghanistan should be brought in line with others'
Monday, 15
February 2010
We all salute the
courage and discipline of our troops in Afghanistan. They are doing their duty
with professionalism as part of Nato's campaign. However our politicians in
London, enjoying their feather-bedded existence and expenses, increasingly look
like First World War generals in the comfort of a chateau while sending
soldiers to their deaths.
Nato is the cornerstone of our defence and the UK should play its full
part. That does not, however, mean that we should provide a disproportionate
share of its resources.
The Jury Team
political party has analysed the latest information from ISAF, the Nato
Afghanistan military command. This shows that we are providing three times more
troops per head of population than our European Nato allies. The UK with 9,500
troops ,has 154 soldiers per million of population. In contrast France, Germany
and Italy have a ratio of only 58, 54 and 52 per million respectively, and
Spain, Portugal and Greece only have 23, 10 and 1 per million. We also have
more than the US, which has 152 per million.
The position on fatalities is even more agonising. Relative to our size we
have had over 12 times more deaths than our European Nato allies. In 2006 the
army was redeployed to Afghanistan and John Reid, the Defence Secretary at the
time, famously said that "our boys" might leave in three years
"without a shot being fired". During 2006-9, Britain suffered 240
troops killed from its 61 million population. In the same period all other
European Nato countries combined have only had 169 deaths from a total
population of 495 million.
The Jury Team believes our policy should be to limit the number of British
troops sent to Afghanistan to the average number sent by other Nato countries
(relative to their population). Our polling through YouGov shows that 67 per
cent of the electorate agree with this proposal and only 14 per cent disagree.
Its implementation would reduce our troop numbers from 9,500 to around 4,000, a
difference of only 7 per cent of total Nato forces deployed.
More British lives will be lost unnecessarily until our current Westminster
leaders stop politicising war and overstretching their loyal military.
Sir Paul Judge is leader of the Jury Team: www.juryteam.org
Related articles in the Independent
- Civilians
killed as Operation Moshtarak tightens screw
- Joya
condemns 'ridiculous' military strategy
- In
Marjah: 'Everyone is hiding. My family are very scared'
- Leading
article: Nothing less than the future of Afghanistan is at stake
ABOUT
The Jury Team is a political movement created with the goal of making politics more accessible, politicians more accountable and political institutions more transparent.
JOIN THE JURY TEAM
Are you unhappy with the way things are? Do you believe they can change? By joining the Jury Team, you are becoming part of a political party like no other.
JURY TEAM BLOG
All the latest goings on within the Jury Team and our reaction to the big political stories as they break.
DONATE
The Jury Team relies on donations to keep running, but unlike other political parties, we abide by the recommendations of the Hayden Phillips report on party funding.




